The airline says the fares – which will initially be offered on flights from Gatwick to Amsterdam, Dubrovnik, Jersey, Tunis and Turin – will give its passengers “more choice”, but they are likely to be viewed as an attempt to compete with low-cost airlines such as Ryanair and Easyjet.
“The suprise is not so much that BA has made this move, but that it has taken so long to do so,” said Nick Trend, Telegraph Travel’s Consumer Editor. “It appears to be a reaction to commercial pressure from its no-frills rivals, which quote lower headline fares because they don't include the cost of checked bags. This can make BA's fares look expensive and so less attractive by contrast.
“BA says that the new fares are about giving it customers ‘more freedom to choose the kind of flying they want’, but they are also about giving British Airways the freedom to make its fares look cheaper.”
He added that those passengers who do check a bag into the hold could eventually end up paying more.
“Airfares are so variable that, within a few weeks, it will be impossible to know whether BA passengers without hold luggage are getting a better deal, or whether those who check in their bags are being charged extra,” he said.
But Peter Simpson, director of Gatwick for British Airways, claimed that passengers who check in a bag will not be expected to pay extra to make up for those who choose the cheaper fares.
"It is all about giving our customers more freedom to choose the kind of flying they want," he said. “Many British Airways customers at Gatwick choose not to check in a bag as they’re already taking advantage of our generous two-bag hand luggage policy. Those who still want to check in a bag will simply pay the same price they do now.”
The new “hand baggage only fares” go on sale next Tuesday (February 26), with starting prices ranging from £39 (one-way to Amsterdam) to £69 (one-way to Turin). BA said that, depending on the route, the fares are between £9 and £15 cheaper than usual.
The announcement by BA - which axed free meals on some flights in 2009 in a bid to cut costs - follows KLM's decision to begin charging customers who check in luggage on short-haul flights. KLM's policy will be effective from April 22.
A spokesman for Ryanair said: “We welcome BA’s conversion to the Ryanair way".
Airlines are always looking to cut down on the weight of an
aircraft. This could be from new planes to reducing the baggage allowance.
British Airways have thought of a good strategy for the company and customers
by offering hand luggage only fares. This is no surprise that British Airways
have done this. No frills organisations such as Ryan Air and easyJet are
putting the pressure on Scheduled airlines. The BA fares are too expensive
which is causing problems. A one-way
ticket has been reduced by approximately £9-15 depending on the route. These fares have started already with flights
to Amsterdam and Turin.
By introducing this, customers have more freedom by
advertising a similar base price without checked luggage. However, I believe
that the cost to check-in a baggage will increase. This is great for those who
do not need to carry much but I believe this is an opportunity to take
advantage. Lowering weight ratios,
increasing air fares, charging more for excess baggage are just the number of
issues that may arise for customers.
I feel that this is a good idea to an extent. The problem with this for me is that it is now creating the problem of increased prices for luggage in the hold. Although they are quite positive and say they will not be making extra charges for luggage in the hold I cant help but think that this may happen anyway. The worry for me is that these big airlines will start doing that it will start turning into no frills airlines. Which is specifically why I travel with airlines such as Virgin and British Airways for the extras that are included in the high prices. However this may benefit a lot of business customers because they will just get charged for their hand luggage.
ReplyDeleteGreat article Darmen, i agree with both you and Emmaline but i think you need to consider the fact that BA and Virgin may not be classed as 'no frill airlines' but in a number of cases there flights can be cheaper. I was recently looking at flights to Spain and it came back with Ryanair as the cheapest, i then went through the booking procedure and realised that the price for luggage etc had yet to be added on, it ended up with BA being the cheapest. Weird i know but it is becoming true! I believe introducing these fares will be excellent, but what if customers are flying to America for a week? They are going to have to take luggage. Will these rates being increased dramatically or will they stay the same. It will be interesting to see how far airlines will go to carry extra cargo!
ReplyDeleteI hope they don't increase baggage fares as they are expensive enough. That's very lucky of you Katy to find a BA flight cheaper than RyanAir, that doesn't happen enough. I believe BA are trying to match its prices with its no-frills competitors which is good as I would rather much prefer to take a flight with BA over Ryanair and EasyJet any day because they provide a better flight experience.
ReplyDelete